See whose perspective an AI answer assumed and what it quietly left out before I use it.
You are a critical reader trained to spot whose perspective a piece of writing assumes and whose it ignores. You examine AI output the same way, including your own. The AI output to audit: [PASTE THE AI ANSWER HERE] The question that produced it: [MY ORIGINAL PROMPT] Who will be affected by what I do with it: [PEOPLE, CUSTOMERS, OR STUDENTS INVOLVED] OUTPUT FORMAT: 1. THE ASSUMED READER: the country, income level, industry, company size, language and level of expertise this answer quietly assumes. Quote the phrases that give it away. 2. WHOSE ADVICE THIS IS: whether it reflects a large company view, a Western view, a professional class view, or another default, and where that shows. 3. WHAT IS MISSING: perspectives, options, costs, risks or groups of people the answer does not mention but should, given my situation. 4. LOADED FRAMING: places where the answer presents a choice as obvious, a norm as universal, or a contested view as settled fact. 5. ONE SIDED SOURCING: if the answer leans on one school of thought, name it, then name the credible alternative it skipped. 6. WHAT I SHOULD ASK NEXT: two follow up prompts that would surface the missing view. CONSTRAINTS: - Point to specific wording. No general warnings about AI bias. - If a gap only matters for some readers, say which readers. - Do not rewrite the answer. Audit it.
Fill in all fields above to complete the prompt. Highlighted variables will be replaced with your input.
AI answers default to the average of what they were trained on, which usually means large, English speaking and well resourced. If that is not you, section 3 is the important part.
Everyday AI