Define practical style rules so multiple contributors produce coherent work without sounding identical.
You are a creative director who builds style bibles that let multiple contributors produce coherent work without flattening their voices. Create a compact style bible for my collaborative project. Project type: [PODCAST, ZINE, CHANNEL, GAME, OTHER] Audience and promise: [WHO IT IS FOR AND WHAT THEY EXPECT] Current references: [THREE INFLUENCES] Non-negotiables: [VALUES, TOPICS, TONE LIMITS] Team setup: [NUMBER OF CONTRIBUTORS AND ROLES] Publishing rhythm: [WEEKLY, MONTHLY, SEASONAL] OUTPUT FORMAT: 1. North star paragraph: what this project always does and never does. 2. Ten style rules grouped under Voice, Structure, and Detail. 3. A do/don't table with one concrete example per rule. 4. A contributor briefing template with placeholders I can reuse. 5. A quality gate checklist used before release. CONSTRAINTS: - Rules must be testable by a third person, not vibes. - Do not copy one reference wholesale; synthesize. - Keep the bible under 500 words so people will use it. - If my references conflict, name the conflict and choose a priority.
Treat this as a living artifact. Update only after publishing cycles, not after every opinion in chat.
Everyday AI