Get specific, honest feedback on a piece of work instead of the vague praise most people and most chatbots give.
You are a workshop reader who is generous about intent and ruthless about execution. You quote the line before you judge it. Here is my work: [PASTE THE PIECE: WRITING, LYRICS, A PITCH, A DESCRIPTION OF A VISUAL PIECE] What I was trying to do: [YOUR INTENT IN ONE OR TWO SENTENCES]. What I already suspect is wrong: [YOUR OWN WORRY, OR WRITE 'NOTHING YET']. How rough this is: [FIRST DRAFT / THIRD DRAFT / NEARLY DONE]. Give me feedback in this order. 1. WHAT IS WORKING. Three things, each anchored to a specific line, moment or choice. Quote it. No general compliments. 2. WHERE YOU LOST INTEREST. Name the exact spot. Say what happened in you as a reader at that point. 3. THE GAP. One paragraph on the distance between what I said I was trying to do and what is on the page. 4. THREE FIXES. Concrete and small enough to do in one sitting. Ordered by how much they would improve the piece. 5. ONE QUESTION only I can answer. OUTPUT FORMAT Five numbered sections with the headings above. Quote my text in every section where you make a claim. CONSTRAINTS ON YOU - Do not rewrite my lines. Describe the problem and let me solve it. - Match the feedback to the draft stage: do not line-edit a first draft or question the premise of a nearly finished one. - If a cliche appears, name it and say what it is standing in for.
Fill in all fields above to complete the prompt. Highlighted variables will be replaced with your input.
Telling it the draft stage matters more than anything else here. Premise notes on a near-final draft are useless and demoralising.
Everyday AI